Team Group T-FORCE CARDEA A440
Team Group
86 综合评分
vs
Samsung 990 PRO
Samsung
98 综合评分
买家怎么说
Team Group T-FORCE CARDEA A440
72 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Teamgroup T-Force Cardea A440 SSD 因其卓越的速度和良好的性价比而获得大部分正面评价，多位用户称赞其在游戏和内容创作中的表现。然而，少数评论者报告了短期内的故障，引发了对长期可靠性的担忧。总体而言，这是一款高性能的驱动器，但可能偶尔出现质量控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的速度
- 性价比高
- 流畅的游戏性能
- 快速数据传输
- 适合照片/视频编辑
缺点
- 可靠性问题
- 短期内故障
- 潜在的质量控制问题
Performance 5
Value for money 3
Reliability 3
Gaming 2
Content creation 2
Speed 4
Samsung 990 PRO
88 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
用户对这款SSD非常满意，称赞其在游戏和照片编辑方面的卓越速度和可靠性能。一位用户提到在激烈游戏时没有散热器温度达到62°C的热担忧，但整体情绪仍然非常积极。该驱动器易于安装，并已证明在一年使用中经久耐用。
优点
- 极速速度
- 安装简便
- 性能可靠
- 翻新价格物有所值
缺点
- 高负载下热担忧
- 不含散热器
Speed 5
Reliability 3
Ease of installation 2
Value for money 1
Thermal performance 1
评分
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Laptop
Portable
规格
| Team Group T-FORCE CARDEA A440 | Samsung 990 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✓ | ✓ |
| Controller | Phison E18 | Samsung |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware Encryption | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Team Group T-FORCE CARDEA A440
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong endurance (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong random (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (28th percentile)
Samsung 990 PRO
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
价格
结论
胜出: Samsung 990 PRO
Scores 98 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 18 specs.
