SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
89 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda X1070 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Seagate
62 综合评分
买家怎么说
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
Seagate FireCuda X1070 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
50 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
现有证据仅包含通用的问答条目，这些条目重复了问题但没有提供实质性答案。没有用户评论或详细反馈来评估实际情绪。因此，整体情绪是中性的，反映出缺乏信息而非正面或负面体验。
评分
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Budget
Portable
规格
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Seagate FireCuda X1070 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC★ | QLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
优缺点
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Seagate FireCuda X1070 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong endurance (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong speed (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
价格
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.043每美元得分
vs
Seagate FireCuda X1070 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.310每美元得分
Seagate FireCuda X1070 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 性价比高 7.2 倍
结论
胜出: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 89 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.
