Timetec Premium SSD 1TB SATA III 2.5"
Timetec
47 综合评分
vs
Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Samsung
97 综合评分
买家怎么说
Timetec Premium SSD 1TB SATA III 2.5"
暂无用户反馈
Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
82 满分 100 置信度中 27 条评价
三星9100 Pro 2TB因其PCIe 5.0的极速性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在数据传输和繁重工作负载方面，用户指出它能与市场上最快的驱动器竞争。虽然大多数评论者非常满意，但有些人提到，在日常任务或游戏中，与PCIe 4.0驱动器相比的速度提升可能不明显，而且不附带散热器是常见的担忧。总体而言，它被视为高端系统的优质可靠选择，但并非预算友好型。
优点
- 极速PCIe 5.0速度
- 出色的数据传输性能
- 可靠的三星品质
- 安装简便
- 与990 Pro相比物有所值
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 日常任务中与PCIe 4.0相比速度提升不明显
- 不经济实惠
- 需要PCIe 5.0支持才能达到全速
Performance speed 8
Value for money 5
Heatsink inclusion 3
Build quality 4
Ease of installation 2
Pcie 5 compatibility 4
评分
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Budget
Laptop
Portable
规格
| Timetec Premium SSD | Samsung 9100 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | 2.5" | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | SATA III | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Protocol | SATA | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | — | 5★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Controller | — | In-House Controller |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | 无数据 | |
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Hardware Encryption | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Timetec Premium SSD 1TB SATA III 2.5"
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong affordability (66th percentile)
- Below average random (22nd percentile)
- Below average speed (28th percentile)
Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average affordability (19th percentile)19th %ile
价格
Timetec Premium SSD 1TB SATA III 2.5"0.337每美元得分
vs
Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.242每美元得分
Timetec Premium SSD 1TB SATA III 2.5" 性价比高 1.4 倍
结论
胜出: Samsung 9100 PRO
Scores 97 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.
