Solidigm D7-PS1010 7.68TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe U.2
Solidigm
83 综合评分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Seagate
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Solidigm D7-PS1010 7.68TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe U.2
暂无用户反馈
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
85 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
这款SSD因其卓越的耐用性和高耐久性而备受赞誉，5年质保和救援服务让人安心。用户强调其超快的顺序读写速度，非常适合游戏和繁重工作负载。支持DirectStorage是现代游戏配置的一个加分项。然而，一些人指出并非所有电脑都能保证兼容，建议检查系统要求。
优点
- 5年质保
- 包含救援服务
- 高耐久性（5,050TBW）
- 快速顺序读写
- 支持DirectStorage
缺点
- 兼容性不保证
- 可能不适合所有电脑
Durability 1
Warranty 1
Performance 1
Compatibility 1
Directstorage support 1
评分
Laptop
Gaming
Workstation
Console
Budget
Portable
规格
| Solidigm D7-PS1010 | Seagate FireCuda 530R | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | U.2 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 无数据 | |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Controller | — | E18 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | 无数据 | |
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
优缺点
Solidigm D7-PS1010 7.68TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe U.2
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong capacity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong speed (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong random (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
价格
Solidigm D7-PS1010 7.68TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe U.20.039每美元得分
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.102每美元得分
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 性价比高 2.6 倍
结论
胜出: Seagate FireCuda 530R
Scores 91 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 18 specs.
