Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Samsung
100 综合评分
vs
MSI SPATIUM M560 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
MSI
70 综合评分
买家怎么说
Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
MSI SPATIUM M560 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
88 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
用户对这款SSD非常满意，称赞其卓越的速度，使Windows和游戏几乎瞬间加载。许多人指出，对于当前游戏来说它有些性能过剩，但为了面向未来是值得的。一些人提到它易于安装，与其他Gen5驱动器相比物有所值。一位用户提到，由于当前CPU的限制，他尚未充分利用其全部潜力，但计划很快升级到Ryzen 9000X3D。
优点
- 卓越的速度
- Windows和游戏加载快速
- 易于安装
- 物有所值
- 可靠的品牌
缺点
- 对当前游戏性能过剩
- 需要兼容的主板
- 旧CPU无法充分发挥潜力
Speed 5
Value for money 3
Ease of installation 2
Brand reliability 2
Future proofing 2
Compatibility 2
评分
Workstation
Console
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
规格
| Samsung 9100 PRO | MSI SPATIUM M560 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5 | 5 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC★ | — |
| DRAM Cache | ✓★ | — |
| Controller | Samsung in-house Controller | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | 无数据 | |
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓ | ✓ |
优缺点
Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
MSI SPATIUM M560 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong endurance (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (79th percentile)
- Strong affordability (74th percentile)
价格
Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.051每美元得分
vs
MSI SPATIUM M560 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.644每美元得分
MSI SPATIUM M560 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 性价比高 12.6 倍
结论
胜出: Samsung 9100 PRO
Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.
