Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Samsung
100 综合评分
vs
Lexar NS100 128GB SATA III 2.5"
Lexar
28 综合评分
买家怎么说
Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
Lexar NS100 128GB SATA III 2.5"
68 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
用户普遍认为这款SSD是预算有限时的好选择，尤其是对于旧机器上的网页浏览和游戏等基本任务。然而，一位用户报告了在NAS中的早期故障，另一位用户指出缺乏DRAM缓存可能导致缓存填满时速度变慢。总体而言，它被认为是物有所值，速度和客户服务方面获得好评。
优点
- 物有所值
- 启动速度快
- 适合基本任务
- 客户服务体验良好
缺点
- NAS中早期故障
- 无DRAM缓存
- 缓存填满时速度变慢
Value for money 3
Reliability 2
Performance 2
Dram cache 2
Customer service 1
评分
Workstation
Console
Gaming
Laptop
Budget
Portable
规格
| Samsung 9100 PRO | Lexar NS100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | 2.5" |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | SATA III |
| Protocol | NVMe | SATA |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | — |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 无数据 | |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC★ | — |
| DRAM Cache | ✓★ | — |
| Controller | Samsung in-house Controller | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | 无数据 | |
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | 3 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
优缺点
Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Lexar NS100 128GB SATA III 2.5"
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong endurance (66th percentile)
- Below average capacity (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average speed (20th percentile)20th %ile
价格
Samsung 9100 PRO 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.051每美元得分
vs
Lexar NS100 128GB SATA III 2.5"0.550每美元得分
Lexar NS100 128GB SATA III 2.5" 性价比高 10.8 倍
结论
胜出: Samsung 9100 PRO
Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 18 specs.
