DATO Extreme 16GB DDR4-3200
DATO
48 综合评分
vs
Team Group Xtreem 32GB DDR5-7200
Team Group
80 综合评分
买家怎么说
DATO Extreme 16GB DDR4-3200
67 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
这款内存套件性能稳定，性价比高，大多数用户反映安装和运行没有问题。然而，有两位经过验证的买家收到了有缺陷的内存条，这降低了整体可靠性。总的来说，这是一个经济实惠的选择，在正常工作时表现良好。
优点
- 性价比极高
- 性能稳定
- 安装简便
- 带散热片的良好做工
- 在Linux上运行良好
缺点
- 有缺陷的内存条被报告
- 质量控制不一致
Value for money 5
Performance 4
Reliability 3
Ease of installation 2
Build quality 2
Defective units 2
Team Group Xtreem 32GB DDR5-7200
72 满分 100 置信度高 50 条评价
TeamGroup 这款高频 DDR5 内存套件在性能和散热方面获得多数好评，许多用户能在高端主板上达到标称速度。然而，也有相当一部分用户报告了稳定性问题、到货即损以及某些主板的兼容性问题，导致整体评价褒贬不一，但总体偏正面。
优点
- 高速下性能出色
- 散热片冷却效果显著
- 高品质海力士A-die颗粒
- 在高端主板上运行良好
- 外观设计美观
缺点
- 标称速度下稳定性问题
- 有到货即损的报告
- 与某些主板存在兼容性问题
- PMIC电压被锁定
- 价格大幅上涨
Performance at rated speed 12
Stability 5
Cooling 4
Compatibility 6
Build quality 3
Value for money 2
评分
Gaming
Workstation
Budget
Laptop
Server
规格
| DATO Extreme | Team Group Xtreem | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16★ | 34 |
| Timings | 16-18-18-38 | 34-42-42-84 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858★ | 1.399999976158142 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0, AMD EXPO | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
优缺点
DATO Extreme 16GB DDR4-3200
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong affordability (67th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
Team Group Xtreem 32GB DDR5-7200
- Strong speed (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong latency (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
- Below average affordability (25th percentile)
价格
DATO Extreme 16GB DDR4-32000.459每美元得分
vs
Team Group Xtreem 32GB DDR5-72000.284每美元得分
DATO Extreme 16GB DDR4-3200 性价比高 1.6 倍
结论
胜出: Team Group Xtreem
Scores 80 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 15 specs.
