Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Black Titanium 256GB

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Black Titanium 256GB

Apple
86 综合评分
vs
Google Pixel 9a Obsidian 128GB

Google Pixel 9a Obsidian 128GB

Google
79 综合评分

评分

Gaming
Apple
92
Google
82
Budget
Apple
91
Google
85
Flagship
Apple
91
Google
78
Photography
Apple
90
Google
71
Foldable
Apple
90
Google
82
Battery Life
Apple
84
Google
84
Rugged
Apple
83
Google
78
Business
Apple
78
Google
73
Compact
Apple
57
Google
74

规格

Apple iPhone 16 Pro MaxGoogle Pixel 9a
Display
Screen Size6.96.3
Display TypeSuper Retina XDROLED
Resolution2868 x 13201080 x 2424
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
Brightness1600 nits2700 nits
HDR
Performance
ProcessorApple A18 Pro3.1 GHz
Processor ModelApple A18 ProGoogle Tensor G4
CPU Cores68
CPU Speed4.053.10
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage256 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1
Expandable
Camera
Main Camera48 MP48 MP
Camera Count32
Ultrawide48 MP13 MP
Telephoto12 MP
Front Camera12 MP13 MP
Optical Zoom5x2x
Video4K@60fps4K
OIS
Battery & Charging
Battery4,685 mAh5,100 mAh
Wired Charging30W23W
Wireless Charging
Fast ChargingFast-charge capablePower Delivery
ConnectorUSB-CUSB-C
Connectivity
5G
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.35
NFC
USBUSB-CUSB-C
SIMeSIMNano-SIM + eSIM
eSIM
Design & Build
Water ResistanceIP68IP68
Form Factorbarbar
Weight0.23 kg0.19 kg
Fingerprintin-display
Face Recognition
OSiOSAndroid
Headphone Jack
Stereo Speakers

优缺点

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Black Titanium 256GB

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong display (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Google Pixel 9a Obsidian 128GB

  • Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong display (84th percentile)84th %ile

价格

结论

胜出: Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 42 specs.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 更擅长:

BudgetGamingRuggedBusinessFlagshipFoldablePhotography

Google Pixel 9a 更擅长:

Compact

也值得考虑