MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

MSI
91 综合评分
vs
Samsung ViewFinity LS34C502GANXZA 34" Black 2023

Samsung ViewFinity LS34C502GANXZA 34" Black 2023

Samsung
77 综合评分

评分

Gaming
MSI
87
Samsung
67
Professional
MSI
87
Samsung
72
Office
MSI
86
Samsung
72
Creative
MSI
86
Samsung
72
Entertainment
MSI
80
Samsung
67
Portable
MSI
14
Samsung
22

规格

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"Samsung ViewFinity LS34C502GANXZA 34"
Display
Size27"34"
Resolution3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Panel TypeOLEDVA
Aspect Ratio16:921:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz100 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms5 ms
Adaptive SyncG-Sync CompatibleFreeSync
Color & HDR
Brightness450 nits300 nits
Color Gamut99% DCI-P372% NTSC
Color Depth10-bit8-bit+FRC
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400HDR10
HDR SupportHDR400HDR10
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C11
Thunderbolt0
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power59W
Weight8.10 kg4.90 kg

优缺点

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong color (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile

Samsung ViewFinity LS34C502GANXZA 34" Black 2023

  • Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong display (79th percentile)

价格

Samsung ViewFinity LS34C502GANXZA 34" Black 2023 is US$562 cheaper (2.7x less).

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 20250.101每美元得分
vs
Samsung ViewFinity LS34C502GANXZA 34" Black 20230.227每美元得分

Samsung ViewFinity LS34C502GANXZA 34" Black 2023 性价比高 2.2 倍

Samsung ViewFinity LS34C502GANXZA 34" Black 2023

结论

胜出: MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"

Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 29 specs.

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" 更擅长:

GamingOfficeCreativeProfessionalEntertainment

Samsung ViewFinity LS34C502GANXZA 34" 更擅长:

Portable

也值得考虑