Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 2022

Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 2022

Samsung
86 综合评分
vs
Acer EZ321Q wi 31.5" White/Silver 2019

Acer EZ321Q wi 31.5" White/Silver 2019

Acer
38 综合评分

评分

Office
Samsung
85
Acer
35
Gaming
Samsung
83
Acer
33
Entertainment
Samsung
75
Acer
31
Professional
Samsung
69
Acer
28
Creative
Samsung
67
Acer
28
Portable
Samsung
16
Acer
4

规格

Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32"Acer EZ321Q wi 31.5"
Display
Size32"31.5"
Resolution2560 x 14401920 x 1080
Panel TypeVAIPS★
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved✓—
Curvature1,000—
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz★60 Hz
Response Time1 ms★4 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium Pro★—
Color & HDR
Brightness350 nits★—
Color Gamut95% DCI-P3—
Color Depth8-bit+FRC★—
HDRHDR—
HDR SupportHDR—
Connectivity
HDMI Ports2★1
DisplayPort1★—
USB-C2★—
Thunderbolt0—
Speakers✓★—
Headphone Jack✓★—
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable✓★—
Tilt✓★—
Swivel✓★—
Pivot✓★—
VESA Mount100x100—
Features
Webcam✗—
Touchscreen✗—
PIP/PBP✗—
Weight7.40 kg★8.33 kg

优缺点

Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 2022

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong performance (89th percentile)89th %ile

Acer EZ321Q wi 31.5" White/Silver 2019

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average portability (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average ergonomic (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average color (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average feature (25th percentile)

价格

Acer EZ321Q wi 31.5" White/Silver 2019 is US$360 cheaper (3.6x less).

Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 20220.172每美元得分
vs
Acer EZ321Q wi 31.5" White/Silver 20190.270每美元得分

Acer EZ321Q wi 31.5" White/Silver 2019 性价比高 1.6 倍

Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" Black 2022

Acer EZ321Q wi 31.5" White/Silver 2019

结论

★ 胜出: Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32"

Scores 86 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 29 specs.

Samsung G75T LS32BG652ENXGO 32" 更擅长:

GamingOfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment

也值得考虑