Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 XF 35mm
Viltrox
97 综合评分
vs
OM System M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ
OM System
60 综合评分
买家怎么说
Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 XF 35mm
85 满分 100 置信度高 95 条评价
Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 镜头因其锐利的画质、大光圈和令人惊讶的低价而广受喜爱。用户称赞其轻巧的设计、紧凑的尺寸和快速的自动对焦，使其成为出色的日常挂机镜头。部分用户注意到自动对焦可能比高端镜头噪音稍大或速度稍慢，少数人在高对比度场景中报告了色差问题。尽管存在一些关于包装或兼容性的零星抱怨，总体评价极为正面。
优点
- 全开光圈下画质锐利
- f/1.7大光圈适合弱光
- 轻巧紧凑的设计
- 性价比极高
- 快速准确的自动对焦
缺点
- 在安静环境下自动对焦有噪音
- 高对比度场景有色差
- 不具备防尘防滴功能
- 弱光下自动对焦较慢
- 缺少光圈环
Image quality 45
Value for money 35
Build quality 30
Autofocus performance 28
Bokeh 15
Low light performance 18
OM System M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ
78 满分 100 置信度高 72 条评价
奥林巴斯 M.Zuiko 14-42mm II R 被广泛誉为最好的套机变焦镜头之一，以其价格提供了令人印象深刻的锐度、紧凑的尺寸和快速的自动对焦。用户欣赏其轻巧的可折叠设计和多功能焦距范围，尽管许多人指出可变光圈（f/3.5-5.6）限制了弱光性能和虚化效果。常见的批评包括塑料卡口、未附带遮光罩以及有时不便的锁定机制。总体而言，它被认为是一款出色的入门镜头，与相机机身捆绑购买时性价比极高。
优点
- 紧凑轻巧的设计
- 套机镜头中令人印象深刻的图像锐度
- 快速安静的自动对焦
- 多功能焦距范围（等效28-84mm）
- 与相机捆绑购买时性价比极高
缺点
- 可变光圈限制了弱光性能
- 塑料卡口感觉廉价
- 未附带遮光罩
- 锁定机制可能很麻烦
- 小光圈限制了虚化效果
Image quality 45
Build quality 30
Size and portability 40
Aperture and low light 25
Autofocus performance 20
Value for money 35
评分
Street
Macro
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
规格
| Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 XF 35mm | OM System M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 14 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 42 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 8 |
| Groups | 9 | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Coating | high-definition multi-layer coating | ZERO |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.7 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.7 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 5 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | APS-C★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.18 kg | 0.09 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 37 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM (Stepping Motor)★ | MSC |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 35 mm★ | 200 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:7.7 | 1:4.35 |
优缺点
Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 XF 35mm
- Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
OM System M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ
- Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong macro (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong versatility (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
价格
Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 XF 35mm0.677每美元得分
vs
OM System M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ0.552每美元得分
Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 XF 35mm 性价比高 1.2 倍
结论
胜出: Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 XF 35mm
Scores 97 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
