Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM
Canon
87 综合评分
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Tamron
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM
82 满分 100 置信度高 331 条评价
佳能 EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 镜头因其出色的锐度、快速安静的自动对焦和轻巧的设计而广受赞誉，对于业余摄影师和野生动物爱好者来说，性价比极高。许多用户强调长焦端令人印象深刻的画质和有效的图像稳定功能，尽管有些人注意到超过 200mm 时画质变软，最大光圈下有明显暗角。少数评论者遇到了质量控制问题，如图像模糊或对焦环失灵，但压倒性的共识是，这款镜头在其价位上提供了卓越的性能。
优点
- 价格下出色的锐度
- 快速安静的STM自动对焦
- 轻巧紧凑的设计
- 有效的图像稳定
- 极佳的性价比
缺点
- 超过200mm画质变软
- 最大光圈下明显暗角
- 塑料制造工艺
- 电子手动对焦需要相机供电
- 最大光圈较慢（250mm 时为 f/5.6）
Image quality 45
Autofocus performance 30
Value for money 35
Build quality 20
Image stabilization 18
Sharpness at long end 25
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
92 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
腾龙28-300mm超级变焦镜头因其轻便设计、多功能焦段和可靠的成像质量而受到称赞。用户赞赏其紧凑的做工和顺滑的变焦环，但指出光圈较小，锐度相比更昂贵的变焦镜头略有不足。经过验证的购买者推荐它作为搭配索尼机身的理想旅行镜头。
优点
- 轻便设计
- 多功能28-300mm焦段
- 顺滑的变焦环
- 紧凑构造适合旅行
- 与索尼机身良好兼容
缺点
- 最大光圈较小 (f/4-7.1)
- 相比高端变焦镜头锐度降低
- 非内变焦设计
- 某些机身上高帧率自动对焦较慢
Build quality 3
Sharpness 3
Aperture 2
Weight and portability 3
Zoom range 4
Autofocus performance 1
评分
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Street
Travel
规格
| Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM | Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 55 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 250 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 15 | 20 |
| Groups | 12 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 0 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| Coating | Super Spectra coating | fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | 4-5.6 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-S | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.38 kg★ | 0.59 kg |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM | VXD linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.29x | 1:2.8★ |
优缺点
Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
价格
Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM0.438每美元得分
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.357每美元得分
Canon EF-S 55-250mm F4-5.6 IS STM 性价比高 1.2 倍
结论
胜出: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
