Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 综合评分
vs
Leitz Cine HEKTOR T2.1 3-Lens Set 25mm

Leitz Cine HEKTOR T2.1 3-Lens Set 25mm

Leitz Cine
26 综合评分

评分

Professional
Nikon
89
Leitz Cine
15
Macro
Nikon
88
Leitz Cine
32
Budget
Nikon
85
Leitz Cine
29
Street
Nikon
84
Leitz Cine
14
Portrait
Nikon
84
Leitz Cine
15
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Leitz Cine
18
Landscape
Nikon
79
Leitz Cine
21
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Leitz Cine
13
Travel
Nikon
70
Leitz Cine
24

规格

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Leitz Cine HEKTOR T2.1 3-Lens Set 25mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm25 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm73 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8T22
Min Aperturef/2.8T2.1
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★0.77 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★305 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

优缺点

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Leitz Cine HEKTOR T2.1 3-Lens Set 25mm

  • Strong versatility (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong macro (69th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

价格

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is US$20,540 cheaper (20.6x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086每美元得分
vs
Leitz Cine HEKTOR T2.1 3-Lens Set 25mm0.001每美元得分

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 性价比高 86.0 倍

Leitz Cine HEKTOR T2.1 3-Lens Set 25mm

结论

★ 胜出: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 更擅长:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

也值得考虑