Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Canon
66 综合评分
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Nikon
80 综合评分
评分
Macro
Budget
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
Street
Travel
规格
| Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM | Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 23 | 17 |
| Groups | 18 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| Coating | ASC, SSC, and Fluorine Coatings | Nano Crystal Coat |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Nikon F |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 2.59 kg | 0.68 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 112 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Dual Nano USM★ | Silent Wave Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5.5 stops★ | 2.5 stops |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.80 m | 290 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.25 | 1:4 |
优缺点
Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average build (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
价格
Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM0.006每美元得分
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR0.107每美元得分
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR 性价比高 17.8 倍
结论
胜出: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.
