Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
90 综合评分
vs
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM 70mm
Canon
64 综合评分
买家怎么说
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
85 满分 100 置信度中 22 条评价
索尼 DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM 镜头是套机18-55mm镜头的显著升级，提供恒定快速光圈、安静自动对焦和卓越画质。用户称赞其锐度、虚化和做工，但指出它更重、体积更大。少数翻新机有轻微划痕或早期故障，但总体而言，该镜头强烈推荐用于索尼 Alpha APS-C 相机。
优点
- 恒定F2.8光圈
- 快速静音自动对焦
- 出色的图像锐度和对比度
- 令人愉悦的虚化效果
- 坚固的做工质量
缺点
- 沉重且笨重
- 部分设备有早期故障
- 不兼容全画幅相机
- 中等眩光问题
- 变焦范围限制在50mm
Image quality 9
Build quality 8
Autofocus performance 5
Weight and size 6
Value for money 4
Refurbished condition 6
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM 70mm
78 满分 100 置信度高 459 条评价
佳能EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM镜头因其卓越的锐度、快速安静的自动对焦和坚固的做工而广受赞誉。许多用户认为它是运动、人像和弱光摄影的主力镜头，尽管缺少图像稳定功能对一些人来说是一个明显的缺点。相当多的评论强调了镜头的重量以及可能出现的对焦不一致问题，尤其是在拍摄移动物体时。关于佳能对旧型号的支持和三脚架环设计的担忧也出现在负面反馈中。
优点
- 卓越的锐度和图像质量
- 快速安静的自动对焦（USM）
- 非常适合弱光摄影
- 适用于运动和肖像的多功能镜头
- 坚固的做工
缺点
- 没有图像稳定功能
- 又重又大
- 三脚架环设计问题
- 对移动物体的自动对焦不一致
- 佳能不再支持维修
Image quality 35
Autofocus performance 28
Build quality 22
Weight and size 18
Image stabilization 15
Value for money 12
评分
Travel
Budget
Street
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Professional
Macro
规格
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM 70mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 70 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 17 |
| Groups | 8 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 5★ |
| Coating | — | Air Sphere Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon EF |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 1.07 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | 3.5 stops |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 700 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x | 0.3x★ |
优缺点
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM 70mm
- Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
价格
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.258每美元得分
vs
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM 70mm0.056每美元得分
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 性价比高 4.6 倍
结论
胜出: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
