Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 综合评分
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Panasonic LUMIX S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Panasonic
68 综合评分

评分

Travel
Sony
94
Panasonic
64
Budget
Sony
91
Panasonic
72
Street
Sony
90
Panasonic
76
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Panasonic
73
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Panasonic
70
Landscape
Sony
79
Panasonic
63
Professional
Sony
77
Panasonic
79
Portrait
Sony
78
Panasonic
72
Macro
Sony
69
Panasonic
58

规格

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSPanasonic LUMIX S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min16 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm35 mm
Elements912
Groups89
Aspherical Elements4★3
ED Elements11
Coating—UHR (Ultra-High Refractive Index)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony EL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★0.50 kg
Filter Thread41 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusdouble-magnet linear motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm250 mm
Max Magnification0.215x0.23x★

优缺点

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Panasonic LUMIX S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (79th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

价格

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is US$800 cheaper (3.3x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.255每美元得分
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm0.059每美元得分

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 性价比高 4.3 倍

结论

★ 胜出: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 更擅长:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Panasonic LUMIX S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm 更擅长:

Professional

也值得考虑