Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 综合评分
vs
BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm
BLAZAR LENS
56 综合评分
评分
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
规格
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 33 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 85 mm |
| Elements | 16 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | T2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 16★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55★ | — |
优缺点
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong versatility (78th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
价格
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.103每美元得分
vs
BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm0.022每美元得分
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm 性价比高 4.7 倍
结论
胜出: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
