Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm

Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm

Viltrox
84 综合评分
vs
Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon
63 综合评分

评分

Macro
Viltrox
90
Canon
39
Street
Viltrox
84
Canon
70
Video Cinema
Viltrox
80
Canon
67
Professional
Viltrox
75
Canon
56
Budget
Viltrox
75
Canon
70
Portrait
Viltrox
70
Canon
70
Landscape
Viltrox
70
Canon
51
Travel
Viltrox
66
Canon
55
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
66
Canon
61

规格

Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mmCanon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min9 mm15 mm
Focal Length Max9 mm45 mm
Elements133
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements3★—
CoatingHD multi-layer nano-coatingCanon coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/9f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Build
MountFujifilm XCanon EF-M
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.13 kg★0.46 kg
Filter Thread49 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMSTM
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—3.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance130 mm★—

优缺点

Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong macro (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile

价格

Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM is US$69 cheaper (1.5x less).

Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm0.420每美元得分
vs
Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM0.486每美元得分

Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM 性价比高 1.2 倍

Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm

Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM

结论

★ 胜出: Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 19 specs.

Viltrox Air AF 9mm f/2.8 9mm 更擅长:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

也值得考虑