Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Canon
88 综合评分
vs
Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm
Sony
75 综合评分
买家怎么说
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
90 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
佳能RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM镜头因其锐度、快速自动对焦和轻量化设计而获得压倒性好评。用户视其为从套机镜头升级的多功能选择，尤其适用于R7和R5 Mark II等无反相机。唯一点评负面的原因是配送问题，而非产品质量。
优点
- 清晰的画质
- 快速准确的对焦
- 轻巧紧凑的设计
- 出色的性价比
- 适用于多种场景的万能性
缺点
- 可能的配送管理问题
Image quality 4
Autofocus performance 3
Weight and portability 6
Value for money 4
Versatility 2
Delivery experience 1
Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm
暂无用户反馈
评分
Professional
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Travel
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Macro
规格
| Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM | Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 70 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 13 |
| Groups | 11 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 5★ |
| ED Elements | 2 | 2 |
| Coating | Super Spectra Coating (SSC) | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.49 kg | 0.35 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM | XD Linear Motors★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5.5 stops★ | 4.5 stops |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 270 mm | 240 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.24x★ | 0.19x |
优缺点
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
- Strong stabilization (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (86th percentile)86th %ile
Sony FE SEL1635Z 16-35mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
价格
结论
胜出: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Scores 88 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.
