Technics EAH-A800
Technics
91 综合评分
vs
LORELEI QC60
LORELEI
54 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-A800
82 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Technics EAH-A800 耳机因其卓越的音质而获得压倒性的积极反馈，许多用户将其与有线耳机相媲美，尤其是在使用 LDAC 编解码器时。评论者称赞其佩戴舒适、主动降噪效果出色，以及能够营造出具有清晰立体声分离度的沉浸式声场。然而，少数用户报告了耐用性问题，例如头梁材料在一个月内松动以及一年后出现故障组件，而其他用户则建议进行小幅改进，例如更大的耳罩和更多的均衡器频段。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 佩戴舒适
- 沉浸式声场和立体声分离
- 支持 LDAC 编解码器，实现高品质音频
缺点
- 头梁材料的耐用性问题
- 一年后出现故障组件
- 耳罩可以稍大一些
- 头梁在头皮上感觉有点硬
- 只有 5 个均衡器频段（希望更多）
Sound quality 7
Build quality 2
Comfort 3
Anc performance 2
Ldac codec 3
Eq customization 2
LORELEI QC60
78 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
这款廉价耳机因其出色的电池续航、舒适的佩戴感和价格合理的降噪效果而受到称赞。音质常被描述为一般或偏小，但大多数用户认为它非常适合学习、健身、看电视或旅行。少数投诉涉及包装简陋和开机噪音大。
优点
- 出色的电池续航
- 佩戴舒适
- 价格合理的降噪效果
- 性价比高
- 结构坚固
缺点
- 音质一般
- 最大音量偏低
- 开机噪音大
- 包装简陋
Battery life 5
Sound quality 9
Noise cancellation 6
Comfort 6
Value for money 7
Build quality 4
评分
Gaming
Work
Calls
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
规格
| Technics EAH-A800 | LORELEI QC60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | — |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.30 kg★ | 0.50 kg |
| Ear Cushion | super-soft earpads | protein |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 2★ |
| Freq Min | 4 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 34 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, LDAC, SBC | LORELEI QC60 Hybrid Active Noise Cancenlling Headphones,Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth Headsets with mic,100H Playtime ，3 EQ Mode Deep Bass, Memory Earmuffs,for Travel Home Office(Beige White) |
| Surround | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones with 2 Device Multipoint Connectivity - EAH-A800-K Black | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear | Technics | Black | Over Ear | Over E | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Dual Hybrid | hybrid |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | — |
| Cable Length | 1 m | — |
| Range | 10.100000381469727 m★ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 50 hrs | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 3 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 10 Hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Capacity | — | 800 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 8★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Alexa | — |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | — |
| App | Technics Audio Connect | — |
优缺点
Technics EAH-A800
- Strong mic (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
LORELEI QC60
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong anc (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average comfort (13th percentile)13th %ile
价格
Technics EAH-A8000.260每美元得分
vs
LORELEI QC601.622每美元得分
LORELEI QC60 性价比高 6.2 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-A800
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 38 specs.
