Philips SHP9500/00
Philips
55 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-A800
Technics
93 综合评分
买家怎么说
Philips SHP9500/00
88 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
Philips SHP9500 开放式耳机因其卓越的性价比而广受赞誉，以实惠的价格提供发烧级音质。评论者强调其清晰细腻的中高频、令人印象深刻的声场以及长时间聆听的出色舒适度。低音紧实准确，但可能无法满足低音爱好者，开放式设计导致声音泄漏严重，不适合公共场合使用。做工质量对得起价格，但有些人指出塑料结构感觉不够高级。
优点
- 卓越的性价比
- 清晰细腻的中高频
- 令人印象深刻的声场
- 长时间佩戴非常舒适
- 轻量化设计
缺点
- 声音泄漏严重
- 低音对低音爱好者来说较弱
- 塑料结构感觉廉价
- 不附带收纳袋
- 夹持力弱，不适合活动使用
Value for money 6
Sound quality 7
Comfort 6
Bass performance 5
Build quality 4
Sound leakage 4
Technics EAH-A800
82 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Technics EAH-A800 耳机因其卓越的音质而获得压倒性的积极反馈，许多用户将其与有线耳机相媲美，尤其是在使用 LDAC 编解码器时。评论者称赞其佩戴舒适、主动降噪效果出色，以及能够营造出具有清晰立体声分离度的沉浸式声场。然而，少数用户报告了耐用性问题，例如头梁材料在一个月内松动以及一年后出现故障组件，而其他用户则建议进行小幅改进，例如更大的耳罩和更多的均衡器频段。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 佩戴舒适
- 沉浸式声场和立体声分离
- 支持 LDAC 编解码器，实现高品质音频
缺点
- 头梁材料的耐用性问题
- 一年后出现故障组件
- 耳罩可以稍大一些
- 头梁在头皮上感觉有点硬
- 只有 5 个均衡器频段（希望更多）
Sound quality 7
Build quality 2
Comfort 3
Anc performance 2
Ldac codec 3
Eq customization 2
评分
Work
Gaming
Budget
Calls
Commute
Studio
Music
规格
| Philips SHP9500/00 | Technics EAH-A800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | open | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.30 kg | 0.30 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | breathable ear cushion | super-soft earpads |
| Headband | steel | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | neodymium | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 50 mm★ | 40 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 12 Hz | 4 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 35 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 101 dB | 105 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones with 2 Device Multipoint Connectivity - EAH-A800-K Black | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear | Technics | Black | Over Ear | Over E |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Dual Hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.5 m | 1 m |
| Range | — | 10.100000381469727 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 50 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 3 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 10 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 8★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri, Alexa |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | Technics Audio Connect |
优缺点
Philips SHP9500/00
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong sound (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average comfort (30th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Technics EAH-A800
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
价格
Philips SHP9500/000.652每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-A8000.267每美元得分
Philips SHP9500/00 性价比高 2.4 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-A800
Scores 93 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 38 specs.
