RØDE NTH-100
RØDE
36 综合评分
vs
TOZO HT2
TOZO
82 综合评分
评分
Budget
Gaming
Music
Commute
Studio
Work
Calls
规格
| RØDE NTH-100 | TOZO HT2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.35 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | Alcantara | Leather |
| Headband | Alcantara | Leather |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 35 kHz | 45 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB★ | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | TOZO Hybrid Active Noise Cancelling Headphones, Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth Headset, 60H Playtime, Hi-Res Audio Custom EQ via App Deep Bass Comfort Fit Ear Cups, for Home Office Travel |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | — |
| Cable Length | 2.4000000953674316 m | 1.8300000429153442 m |
| Range | — | 30 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | higher voltages and charging interfaces |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 3★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| App | — | TOZO APP |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
优缺点
RØDE NTH-100
- Strong sound (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
- Below average comfort (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average anc (33rd percentile)
TOZO HT2
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong battery (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
价格
RØDE NTH-1000.268每美元得分
vs
TOZO HT22.566每美元得分
TOZO HT2 性价比高 9.6 倍
结论
胜出: TOZO HT2
Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 35 specs.
