Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
Beyerdynamic
80 综合评分
vs
Anker Soundcore Space D1402
Anker
83 综合评分
买家怎么说
Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
78 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
这些耳机因其分析性声音、出色的分离度和低音质感而受到称赞，尤其是在使用aptX无损编解码器时。然而，由于声音特性令人疲劳且毫不留情，不建议用于休闲聆听或看电影。电池续航和低延迟受到赞赏，但在宏大的管弦乐作品中声场可能显得平淡。
优点
- 出色的分离度和解析力
- 丰富的低音质感
- 蓝牙低延迟
- aptX无损编解码器下表现出色
- 电子音乐表现出色
缺点
- 看电影和休闲聆听时令人疲劳
- 宏大的管弦乐作品中声场平淡
- 需要aptX兼容音源才能获得最佳音质
Sound quality 2
Analytical sound signature 2
Battery life 1
Latency 1
Codec support 1
Comfort for casual use 1
Anker Soundcore Space D1402
88 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
Soundcore Space 2 耳机以其卓越的舒适性、长电池续航和价格下强大的降噪功能给用户留下了深刻印象。虽然默认音效可能需要通过应用调整，但整体音质、做工以及多点连接和LDAC等功能使其物超所值。小缺点包括长时间佩戴发热和缺乏防水性。
优点
- 卓越的舒适性
- 长电池续航
- 强大的降噪
- 物超所值
- 通过应用可自定义EQ
缺点
- 默认音效需要调整
- 长时间佩戴发热
- 不防水
- 3D音频模式华而不实
Comfort 5
Battery life 4
Noise cancellation 5
Sound quality 5
Value for money 4
App experience 4
评分
Music
Gaming
Studio
Budget
Commute
Work
Calls
规格
| Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 | Anker Soundcore Space D1402 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.32 kg | 0.26 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | memory foam | protein leather |
| Headband | memory foam | memory foam with a soft leather finish |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 45 mm★ | 40 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive | SBC, AAC, LDAC |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 6.0 |
| Profiles | AVDTP, AVDTP, GAVDP, SPP, A2DP, AVRCP, HFP | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Range | 15 m★ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 50 hrs | 50 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 10 Minutes for 5 Hours | 5 min for 4 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | 3 |
| NC Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Dolby Head Tracking Technology | Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | Beyerdynamic | Soundcore |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
优缺点
Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (87th percentile)87th %ile
Anker Soundcore Space D1402
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
价格
Beyerdynamic Aventho 3000.402每美元得分
vs
Anker Soundcore Space D14020.750每美元得分
Anker Soundcore Space D1402 性价比高 1.9 倍
结论
胜出: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300
Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 40 specs.
