Bose QuietComfort 884367-0100
Bose
77 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-A800
Technics
90 综合评分
买家怎么说
Bose QuietComfort 884367-0100
85 满分 100 置信度中 17 条评价
Bose QuietComfort 耳机因其卓越的音质、舒适性和有效的降噪功能而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户称赞其长续航、优质做工和无缝连接，尽管有些人指出降噪效果与 AirPods Pro 等竞争对手相比可能略逊一筹。总体而言，强烈推荐用于日常使用、旅行和长时间聆听。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 出色的降噪效果
- 长时间佩戴非常舒适
- 长续航（24小时）
- 优质做工
缺点
- 降噪效果不如 AirPods Pro 强劲
- 充电时间较长
- 无法实现完全隔音
- 与旧设备存在一些连接问题
Sound quality 10
Noise cancellation 8
Comfort 5
Battery life 4
Build quality 4
Connectivity 3
Technics EAH-A800
82 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Technics EAH-A800 耳机因其卓越的音质而获得压倒性的积极反馈，许多用户将其与有线耳机相媲美，尤其是在使用 LDAC 编解码器时。评论者称赞其佩戴舒适、主动降噪效果出色，以及能够营造出具有清晰立体声分离度的沉浸式声场。然而，少数用户报告了耐用性问题，例如头梁材料在一个月内松动以及一年后出现故障组件，而其他用户则建议进行小幅改进，例如更大的耳罩和更多的均衡器频段。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 佩戴舒适
- 沉浸式声场和立体声分离
- 支持 LDAC 编解码器，实现高品质音频
缺点
- 头梁材料的耐用性问题
- 一年后出现故障组件
- 耳罩可以稍大一些
- 头梁在头皮上感觉有点硬
- 只有 5 个均衡器频段（希望更多）
Sound quality 7
Build quality 2
Comfort 3
Anc performance 2
Ldac codec 3
Eq customization 2
评分
Work
Gaming
Budget
Calls
Commute
Studio
Music
规格
| Bose QuietComfort 884367-0100 | Technics EAH-A800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.43 kg | 0.30 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | Protein Leather | super-soft earpads |
| Headband | Metal, Plastic | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz | 4 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 127.80000305175781 dB★ | 105 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Bose QuietComfort Headphones - Wireless Bluetooth Headphones, Active Over Ear Noise Cancelling and Mic, USB-C Charging, Deep Bass, Up to 24 Hours of Playtime, Black | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones with 2 Device Multipoint Connectivity - EAH-A800-S Silver | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear | Technics | Silver | Over Ear | Over |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | Dual Hybrid feedforward & feedback |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2★ |
| Profiles | A2DP, HFP, AVRCP, BLE | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 0.30000001192092896 m | 1 m |
| Range | 9.100000381469727 m | 10.100000381469727 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 24 hrs | 50 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | 3 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 2.5 Hours | 15 Minutes for 10 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 1 | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri | Siri, Alexa |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | Bose app | Technics Audio Connect |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX0 | — |
优缺点
Bose QuietComfort 884367-0100
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average comfort (13th percentile)13th %ile
Technics EAH-A800
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
价格
Bose QuietComfort 884367-01000.457每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-A8000.257每美元得分
Bose QuietComfort 884367-0100 性价比高 1.8 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-A800
Scores 90 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 41 specs.
