Marshall Monitor III A.N.C.
Marshall
79 综合评分
vs
JBL Tune 670NC
JBL
90 综合评分
买家怎么说
Marshall Monitor III A.N.C.
92 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
Marshall Monitor III 耳机因其出色的音质、舒适度和电池续航而获得压倒性的正面反馈。用户称赞其清晰细腻的音频、宽广的声场和有效的噪音消除，并经常将其与更昂贵的品牌进行有利比较。轻量级设计和柔软的耳垫使其长时间佩戴舒适，尽管有些人觉得它们有点大。一个小缺点是耳垫在温暖天气下会导致出汗，并且自动暂停功能有轻微延迟。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 有效的噪音消除
- 长电池续航（70小时）
- 舒适的耳垫
- 轻量级设计
缺点
- 耳垫在温暖天气下会导致出汗
- 自动暂停功能有轻微延迟
- 对于某些头型来说有点大
Sound quality 5
Noise cancellation 3
Battery life 2
Comfort 4
Build quality 3
Value for money 2
JBL Tune 670NC
87 满分 100 置信度中 16 条评价
大多数用户喜爱这款JBL耳机，称赞其出色的音质、有效的降噪、舒适的佩戴和长续航，许多人认为性价比很高。一位评论者报告了一个有缺陷的单元，一侧没有声音。简单的控制、可折叠的设计和应用程序连接也受到好评。总体情绪非常积极，但有一个小的质量控制问题。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 有效的降噪
- 长电池寿命
- 舒适的佩戴
- 很高的性价比
缺点
- 可能有缺陷的单元（一侧无声音）
- 问答区的问题没有答案
Sound quality 5
Noise cancellation 4
Battery life 3
Comfort 2
Value for money 3
Build quality 1
评分
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Work
Music
Studio
Calls
规格
| Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. | JBL Tune 670NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.25 kg | 0.17 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | soft ear cushions |
| Headband | — | padded headband |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 46 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 91.69999694824219 dB | 98 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 95 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✗ |
| Codecs | Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Wireless Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones - Active Noise Cancelling with Microphone | 100+ Hr Playtime | Lightweight, Foldable Design for Travel - Cream | SBC, AAC, LC3 |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | three levels of noise cancellation, low, mid and high | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | — | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | — | 1.2192000150680542 m |
| Range | 10.100000381469727 m★ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 100 hrs★ | 70 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 15 minutes gives 12 hours of playtime | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 690 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 1★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Voice assistant | voice assistant |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | Marshall Bluetooth app | JBL Headphones |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Marshall Monitor III A.N.C.
- Strong battery (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong anc (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
JBL Tune 670NC
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
价格
Marshall Monitor III A.N.C.0.395每美元得分
vs
JBL Tune 670NC1.500每美元得分
JBL Tune 670NC 性价比高 3.8 倍
结论
胜出: JBL Tune 670NC
Scores 90 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 41 specs.
