Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95
Bang & Olufsen
75 综合评分
vs
JBL Tune 670NC
JBL
90 综合评分
买家怎么说
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95
72 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
Beoplay H95 耳机因其中性、透明的音质、宽广的声场和优质的做工而受到称赞。然而，许多用户指出，它们佩戴起来很重且不舒服，贴合度紧，头梁会造成压力点。音量也是一个常见问题，有些人认为音量不足，尤其是在飞机上。虽然音质被认为出色且精致，但舒适度问题和高昂的价格导致了复杂的感受。
优点
- 中性透明的音质
- 宽广的声场
- 优质做工
- 不扭曲音色的有效降噪
- 舒适的耳垫
缺点
- 长时间佩戴沉重且不舒适
- 贴合度紧，头梁有压力点
- 某些曲目音量不足
- 降噪效果与竞品相比一般
- 对中等大小的耳朵不舒适
Sound quality 8
Comfort 6
Build quality 5
Anc performance 5
Volume level 4
Battery life 3
JBL Tune 670NC
87 满分 100 置信度中 16 条评价
大多数用户喜爱这款JBL耳机，称赞其出色的音质、有效的降噪、舒适的佩戴和长续航，许多人认为性价比很高。一位评论者报告了一个有缺陷的单元，一侧没有声音。简单的控制、可折叠的设计和应用程序连接也受到好评。总体情绪非常积极，但有一个小的质量控制问题。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 有效的降噪
- 长电池寿命
- 舒适的佩戴
- 很高的性价比
缺点
- 可能有缺陷的单元（一侧无声音）
- 问答区的问题没有答案
Sound quality 5
Noise cancellation 4
Battery life 3
Comfort 2
Value for money 3
Build quality 1
评分
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Work
Music
Studio
Calls
规格
| Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95 | JBL Tune 670NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.32 kg | 0.17 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | lambskin leather, memory foam | soft ear cushions |
| Headband | soft top grain lambskin | padded headband |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm★ | 32 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 12 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 98 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 95 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✗ | ✗ |
| Codecs | AAC, aptX, SBC | SBC, AAC, LC3 |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.25 m | 1.2192000150680542 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 38 hrs | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Fast Charging | — | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 690 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4★ | 1 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | voice assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | B&O | JBL Headphones |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | IP53 | — |
优缺点
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H95
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong sound (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong anc (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong mic (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
JBL Tune 670NC
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
价格
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay H950.060每美元得分
vs
JBL Tune 670NC1.501每美元得分
JBL Tune 670NC 性价比高 25.0 倍
结论
胜出: JBL Tune 670NC
Scores 90 overall, wins 5 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 42 specs.
