Bowers & Wilkins PX8 Over-Ear Headphones Wireless
Bowers & Wilkins
73 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-A800
Technics
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Bowers & Wilkins PX8 Over-Ear Headphones Wireless
88 满分 100 置信度低 6 条评价
Bowers & Wilkins PX8 耳机因其卓越的音质、Nappa 皮革和铝制等高级材料以及出色的舒适度而获得压倒性的正面评价。用户形容其音频沉浸感强、细节丰富且引人入胜，常常优于 Bose 和 Sony 等竞争对手。然而，也注意到一些担忧：主动降噪效果不错但并非同类最佳，并且有关于头梁耐用性问题的个别报告，以及可能将翻新产品作为新品出售的情况。
优点
- 卓越的音质和细节
- Nappa 皮革和铝制高级结构
- 长时间佩戴的出色舒适度
- 沉浸式且引人入胜的音频体验
- 快速充电和良好的电池续航
缺点
- 主动降噪不错但非同类最佳
- 头梁耐用性潜在问题
- 需要煲机期以获得最佳音质
- 通透模式表现一般
- 有收到翻新产品冒充新品的风险
Sound quality 6
Build quality 5
Comfort 4
Active noise cancellation 3
Battery life 3
Durability 2
Technics EAH-A800
82 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Technics EAH-A800 耳机因其卓越的音质而获得压倒性的积极反馈，许多用户将其与有线耳机相媲美，尤其是在使用 LDAC 编解码器时。评论者称赞其佩戴舒适、主动降噪效果出色，以及能够营造出具有清晰立体声分离度的沉浸式声场。然而，少数用户报告了耐用性问题，例如头梁材料在一个月内松动以及一年后出现故障组件，而其他用户则建议进行小幅改进，例如更大的耳罩和更多的均衡器频段。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 佩戴舒适
- 沉浸式声场和立体声分离
- 支持 LDAC 编解码器，实现高品质音频
缺点
- 头梁材料的耐用性问题
- 一年后出现故障组件
- 耳罩可以稍大一些
- 头梁在头皮上感觉有点硬
- 只有 5 个均衡器频段（希望更多）
Sound quality 7
Build quality 2
Comfort 3
Anc performance 2
Ldac codec 3
Eq customization 2
评分
Gaming
Work
Calls
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
规格
| Bowers & Wilkins PX8 Over-Ear Headphones Wireless | Technics EAH-A800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.32 kg | 0.30 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | Leather | super-soft earpads |
| Headband | aluminum | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | carbon drive | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 4 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 8 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 105 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | Bowers & Wilkins Px8 Over-Ear Headphones Wireless Bluetooth Noise Cancelling, Luxurious Materials, 30-Hour Battery Life, 15-Min Quick Charging, Black | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones with 2 Device Multipoint Connectivity - EAH-A800-K Black | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear | Technics | Black | Over Ear | Over E |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | Dual Hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Cable Length | — | 1 m |
| Range | — | 10.100000381469727 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 30 hrs | 50 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | 3 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 15min charge for 7 hours playback | 15 Minutes for 10 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri, Alexa |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | B&W Music App | Technics Audio Connect |
优缺点
Bowers & Wilkins PX8 Over-Ear Headphones Wireless
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong sound (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong mic (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average comfort (15th percentile)15th %ile
Technics EAH-A800
- Strong mic (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (95th percentile)95th %ile
价格
Bowers & Wilkins PX8 Over-Ear Headphones Wireless0.154每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-A8000.260每美元得分
Technics EAH-A800 性价比高 1.7 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-A800
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 38 specs.
