ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6
ASRock
56 综合评分
vs
PNY Quadro NVS 510 2GB DDR3 workstation
PNY
28 综合评分
买家怎么说
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6
82 满分 100 置信度中 18 条评价
ASRock RX 7600 Challenger 8GB 因其在1080p下的扎实性能、良好的散热和简单的RGB软件而广受好评。用户赞赏其在预算装机中的性价比，尽管一些人指出8GB显存和光线追踪在高分辨率下有所限制。少数人提到驱动不稳定和ASRock缺乏支持。
优点
- 1080p性能扎实
- 负载下温度良好
- RGB软件简单易用
- 预算装机性价比高
- 能效高
缺点
- 8GB显存在1440p下受限
- 光线追踪性能平庸
- 更新后驱动不稳定
- ASRock缺乏支持
Performance 1080p 6
Value for money 5
Thermals 4
Build quality 3
Rgb software 3
Vram limitation 3
PNY Quadro NVS 510 2GB DDR3 workstation
72 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
NVIDIA NVS 510 在多显示器商务用途中普遍获得好评，用户称赞其驱动四台显示器的能力和性价比。常见问题包括缺少转接线、偶尔与 HP Envy 等特定系统不兼容，以及 Zoom 虚拟背景的限制。尽管存在这些问题，许多人认为它在办公应用、视频编辑和股票交易中稳定且有效。
优点
- 轻松驱动四台显示器
- 性价比出色
- 办公应用稳定运行
- 附带 mini-DP 转 DP 转接线
- 安装简单
缺点
- 部分发货缺少转接线
- 不适用于 HP Envy 系统
- 不支持 Zoom 虚拟背景
- 与旧主板内存不兼容
- 光盘文档不完整
Multi monitor support 5
Value for money 4
Missing accessories 3
System compatibility 2
Installation difficulty 2
Gaming unsuitability 2
评分
Budget
Gaming 1080p
Content Creation
Ray Tracing
Gaming 1440p
Workstation
Gaming 4k
Ai Llm
规格
| ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger | PNY Quadro NVS 510 | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro NVS 510 |
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | RDNA 3 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Class | consumer | workstation |
| Process | 6 | 5★ |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 8 GB★ | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6★ | DDR3 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| CUDA Cores | 无数据 | |
| Stream Processors | 无数据 | |
| Tensor Cores | 64★ | — |
| RT Cores | 32 | 54★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 43.5 | 55.29999923706055★ |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 21.75 | 27.649999618530273★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | 无数据 | |
| GPU Compute | 无数据 | |
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 165★ | 295 |
| Recommended PSU | 550 | 450★ |
| Power Connectors | 8-Pin | None |
| Cooler | Dual Fan★ | Passive |
| Fans | 2★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 4.0 x8 | PCI Express x16 |
| DisplayPort | 3 | 4★ |
| HDMI | 1★ | 0 |
| Max Displays | 4★ | — |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 | 3840x2160 |
| Physical | ||
| Length | 269 | 160★ |
| Slot Width | 2 | 1★ |
| Form Factor | ATX | Low Profile |
| Weight | 0.91 kg | 0.21 kg★ |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Upscaling | — | None |
| AV1 Encode | ✓★ | ✗ |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| RGB | ✓★ | ✗ |
优缺点
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong connectivity (71st percentile)
PNY Quadro NVS 510 2GB DDR3 workstation
- Strong compute (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Below average efficiency (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average raster (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average vram (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average thermal (15th percentile)15th %ile
价格
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR60.182每美元得分
vs
PNY Quadro NVS 510 2GB DDR3 workstation0.296每美元得分
PNY Quadro NVS 510 2GB DDR3 workstation 性价比高 1.6 倍
结论
胜出: ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger
Scores 56 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 16 of 38 specs.
