JLab Flex EBFLEXRBLK124

JLab Flex EBFLEXRBLK124

JLab
66 综合评分
vs
Apple AirPods Pro 3

Apple AirPods Pro 3

Apple
95 综合评分

评分

Budget
JLab
67
Apple
100
Commute
JLab
49
Apple
99
Fitness
JLab
63
Apple
97
Travel
JLab
51
Apple
95
Calls
JLab
53
Apple
91
Gaming
JLab
62
Apple
85
Music
JLab
54
Apple
77

规格

JLab Flex EBFLEXRBLK124Apple AirPods Pro 3
Design
Form Factoropen-earin-ear
Wearing Styleclip ontrue wireless
Ear Tips—XXS, XS, S, M, L
Weight0.06 kg0.01 kg★
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size12 mm★—
Drivers2★1
Freq Min20 Hz★—
Freq Max20 kHz★—
Impedance12 Ω—
Hi-Res Audio—✓★
CodecsSBCAAC, SBC
Surround—Spatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC✗✓★
ANC Type—Adaptive Audio
Transparency✓✓
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.35.3
ProfilesHSP, HFP, A2DP, AVRCP—
Multipoint✓✓
Wired Connector—USB-C
Earbud Battery
Battery Life6 hrs8 hrs★
Charge Time2 hrs★—
Fast Charging—5 minutes in the case provides around 1 hour of listening time
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery21 hrs24 hrs★
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging✓✓
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count22
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice Assistant—Siri
Touch Controls✓✓
AppJLab AppAndroid & iOS
Bone Conduction—✗
Water ResistanceIPX4IP57

优缺点

JLab Flex EBFLEXRBLK124

  • Strong connectivity (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong sound (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong mic (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average battery (20th percentile)20th %ile

Apple AirPods Pro 3

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

价格

JLab Flex EBFLEXRBLK124 is US$159 cheaper (5.0x less).

JLab Flex EBFLEXRBLK1241.640每美元得分
vs
Apple AirPods Pro 30.477每美元得分

JLab Flex EBFLEXRBLK124 性价比高 3.4 倍

结论

★ 胜出: Apple AirPods Pro 3

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 5 of 36 specs.

Apple AirPods Pro 3 更擅长:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

也值得考虑