JVC True Wireless In-Ear HAA4TB
JVC
55 综合评分
vs
Creative EF1150
Creative
64 综合评分
评分
Budget
Gaming
Music
Travel
Calls
Fitness
Commute
规格
| JVC True Wireless In-Ear HAA4TB | Creative EF1150 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Weight | 0.07 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | MEMS |
| Driver Size | 12 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | Creative Aurvana Ace with xMEMS Driver, Lightweight True Wireless Sweatproof in-Ears with Bluetooth LE Audio, aptX Adaptive, AAC, ANC, Ambient Mode, IPX5, Up to 24 Hours Battery Life |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 26 hrs★ | 6 hrs |
| Fast Charging | — | 5 minutes charging delivers a full hour of use |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 18 hrs | 24 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Voice assistant | Siri, Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX5 |
优缺点
JVC True Wireless In-Ear HAA4TB
- Strong battery (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong connectivity (74th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Creative EF1150
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
价格
JVC True Wireless In-Ear HAA4TB2.766每美元得分
vs
Creative EF11501.167每美元得分
JVC True Wireless In-Ear HAA4TB 性价比高 2.4 倍
结论
胜出: Creative EF1150
Scores 64 overall, wins 5 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 25 specs.
