Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
86 综合评分
vs
APETOO APETOO-217
APETOO
31 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
APETOO APETOO-217
88 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
这款有线运动耳塞凭借创新的翼尖设计，在舒适度和稳固贴合方面获得高度评价，尤其适合小耳朵用户。音质被描述为尚可到出人意料的强劲，低音深沉，但未达到发烧友级别。用户赞赏其防汗设计、用于防缠绕的磁吸背面以及附带的收纳盒。少数人注意到缺少音量控制和隔音效果一般，但总体而言，对于活跃使用场景，它们被视为性价比极高的选择。
优点
- 翼尖设计确保稳固贴合
- 小耳朵佩戴舒适
- 音质尚可，低音深沉
- 防汗设计
- 磁吸背面防止缠绕
缺点
- 耳塞上没有音量控制
- 隔音效果一般
- 音质未达发烧友级别
- 收纳盒质感廉价
Fit and comfort 7
Sound quality 7
Value for money 5
Sweat resistance 3
Build quality 3
Noise isolation 2
评分
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Travel
Budget
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ80 | APETOO APETOO-217 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | ear-tip |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L, XL | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | 3.5 mm |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LDAC, SBC | APETOO Wired Ear Buds Sport in-Ear Headphones with Anti Fall/Hurt Wingtips, Mute Mic, Pure Stereo Bass, Noise Isolating Aux 3.5mm Earbuds for iPhone/iPad/Android/Mac/Laptop/PC/Women/Small Ear/School |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 7 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 16 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Capacity | 85 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 8★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | Technics Audio Connect | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX5 |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
APETOO APETOO-217
- Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average sound (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average comfort (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average connectivity (32nd percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ800.572每美元得分
vs
APETOO APETOO-2171.527每美元得分
APETOO APETOO-217 性价比高 2.7 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 37 specs.
