Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
86 综合评分
vs
MOSWAG
MOSWAG
47 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
MOSWAG
78 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
总体而言，用户认为这款耳机性价比高，音质不错且佩戴舒适。许多人喜欢附带的收纳袋和用于音乐及播客的清晰音频。主要缺点包括音量控制失灵，会直接跳到最大，以及耳塞可能对某些耳朵来说太大。尽管存在这些问题，大多数买家对价格感到满意。
优点
- 音质好
- 佩戴舒适
- 音频清晰
- 附带收纳袋
- 性价比高
缺点
- 音量控制跳至最大
- 耳塞对某些耳朵太大
- 容易从插孔中拔出
- 低音较弱
Sound quality 8
Value for money 5
Build quality 4
Comfort and fit 4
Volume control issue 3
Included accessories 3
评分
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Travel
Budget
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ80 | MOSWAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | — |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L, XL | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.02 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 14.199999809265137 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 118 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LDAC, SBC | MOSWAG Wired Earbuds, 3.5mm Jack in-Ear Headphones with Microphone Volum Control Clear Calls Suitable for iPhone, iPad, Samsung, Computer, Laptop, School Students, Black |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 7 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 16 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Capacity | 85 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 8★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Technics Audio Connect | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
MOSWAG
- Strong affordability (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong comfort (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong sound (77th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ800.572每美元得分
vs
MOSWAG5.895每美元得分
MOSWAG 性价比高 10.3 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 86 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 38 specs.
