Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
86 综合评分
vs
Sennheiser IE 500432
Sennheiser
23 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
Sennheiser IE 500432
82 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
Sennheiser IE 4 耳塞获得了压倒性的正面反馈，许多用户认为其音质对于价格来说非常出色，中音自然，高音细节丰富。然而，少数用户报告了问题，例如一个耳塞有咔嗒声，以及连接器较大，不适合某些手机壳。总体而言，它们因耐用性、隔音效果以及适用于舞台监听和通勤而受到称赞。
优点
- 自然的中音和人声
- 通勤时出色的隔音效果
- 耐用的做工
- 物超所值
- 煲机后细节丰富的高音
缺点
- 左耳塞有咔嗒声
- 连接器较大，不适合某些手机壳
- 低音对某些人来说可能过重
- 包装简陋
- 拉扯时耳罩可能脱落
Sound quality 7
Value for money 5
Build quality 5
Isolation 4
Bass response 4
Connector issue 2
评分
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Travel
Budget
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ80 | Sennheiser IE 500432 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | in-ear |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L, XL | three different sizes |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 140 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LDAC, SBC | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | hybrid | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 7 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 16 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Capacity | 85 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| Mic Count | 8★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | Technics Audio Connect | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (11th percentile)11th %ile
Sennheiser IE 500432
- Strong user sentiment (67th percentile)
- Below average mic (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average connectivity (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average affordability (28th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ800.573每美元得分
vs
Sennheiser IE 5004320.263每美元得分
Technics EAH-AZ80 性价比高 2.2 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 23 of 36 specs.
