Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
BASN Bmaster B5
BASN
43 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
用户对Technics EAH-AZ100耳机普遍持积极态度，称赞其卓越的音质，尤其是LDAC和杜比全景声，以及令人惊讶的有效AI通话降噪功能，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。舒适度、通过应用程序进行定制以及可靠的电池续航也受到强调。唯一提到的潜在缺点是价格较高，但大多数人认为高端功能物有所值。
优点
- LDAC带来的卓越音质
- AI通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 可靠的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- ANC比AZ80稍弱
Sound quality 8
Call quality 2
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
BASN Bmaster B5
72 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
BASN Bmaster 5 入耳式监听耳机提供了令人印象深刻的音质，中高频清晰，声场中性，搭配记忆海绵耳塞佩戴舒适。然而，多位用户报告了耐用性问题，例如耳塞帽脱落、线缆故障和左耳塞失效，有时仅在使用几个月后就会出现。附带的配件（金属盒、两根线缆、多种耳塞）备受好评，客户服务似乎对缺陷问题响应迅速。对于不需要强劲低音的歌手和吉他手来说，相比单驱动单元型号，这是一个显著的升级，但长期可靠性或低音表现方面仍存疑虑。
优点
- 清晰的人声和干净的中高频
- 中性自然的声音特性
- 记忆海绵耳塞佩戴舒适
- 出色的做工和专业的造型
- 丰富的配件（金属盒、两根线缆）
缺点
- 耳塞帽脱落
- 线缆故障和静电问题
- 左耳塞失灵
- 低音响应对于贝斯手来说太平淡
- 佩戴体积较大，突出耳外
Sound quality 15
Durability 8
Bass response 8
Comfort and fit 7
Cable quality 6
Value for money 6
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | BASN Bmaster B5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | ear-hook |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | 12 sizes |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | hybrid |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | 8 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 5★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 13 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | Detachable Silver-plated OFC Cable, HiFi Stereo Sound, Hybrid Five Drivers IEMs, Interchangeable 3.5& 4.4mm Plugs, Noise Isolation earbuds, Upgrade MMCX Connectors |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | 3.5mm |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | Water-Resistant |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
BASN Bmaster B5
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Strong mic (67th percentile)
- Below average comfort (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (33rd percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ1000.426每美元得分
vs
BASN Bmaster B50.300每美元得分
Technics EAH-AZ100 性价比高 1.4 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 40 specs.
