Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL
Audio-Technica
35 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
用户对Technics EAH-AZ100耳机普遍持积极态度，称赞其卓越的音质，尤其是LDAC和杜比全景声，以及令人惊讶的有效AI通话降噪功能，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。舒适度、通过应用程序进行定制以及可靠的电池续航也受到强调。唯一提到的潜在缺点是价格较高，但大多数人认为高端功能物有所值。
优点
- LDAC带来的卓越音质
- AI通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 可靠的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- ANC比AZ80稍弱
Sound quality 8
Call quality 2
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL
85 满分 100 置信度低 6 条评价
这些Audio-Technica夹耳式耳机因其出色的性价比、不错的音质以及独特的挂颈式时尚设计而备受赞誉。用户欣赏其轻巧的构造和开放式设计，这能保持环境感知，但有些人指出存在漏音问题，且塑料耳夹在长时间佩戴时可能引起不适。总体而言，推荐给休闲聆听和喜欢这种风格的人，但不适合追求隔音效果的发烧友。
优点
- 性价比极高
- 休闲聆听音质尚可
- 独特时尚的设计
- 轻巧，短时间佩戴舒适
- 开放式设计可感知环境
缺点
- 漏音明显
- 塑料耳夹长时间佩戴可能不适
- 线缆管理滑块脆弱
- 不适合发烧友
- 开放式设计在安静区域不私密
Value for money 5
Sound quality 5
Design and style 4
Comfort 4
Build quality 4
Audio leakage 3
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | ear-tip |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | — |
| Weight | 0.05 kg | 0.02 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 20 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | — |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Strong sound (72nd percentile)
- Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ1000.426每美元得分
vs
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL2.213每美元得分
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL 性价比高 5.2 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 20 of 39 specs.
