Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
vs
Csasan J90 Pro
Csasan
59 综合评分
买家怎么说
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Csasan J90 Pro
78 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
J90 Pro 耳机在音质、电池续航和舒适度方面获得了大部分正面反馈，许多用户称赞 AI 翻译功能是旅行和语言学习的有用工具。然而，一些评论强调了翻译应用程序的重大问题，包括性能缓慢、强制语言选择以及不可靠的实时对话支持。虽然耳机作为音频设备表现出色，但翻译功能不一致，可能无法满足无缝沟通的期望。
优点
- 出色的音质，低音深沉
- 长电池续航（长达40小时）
- 长时间佩戴舒适
- 快速蓝牙5.3连接
- 性价比高
缺点
- 翻译应用程序缓慢且不可靠
- 自由对话模式下强制选择语言
- 实时翻译跟不上对话
- 麦克风质量差，不适合通话
- 翻译需要数据连接
Sound quality 8
Battery life 6
Translation performance 7
Comfort and fit 5
Value for money 5
App reliability 3
评分
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Budget
Fitness
规格
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Csasan J90 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.10 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 13 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | AAC |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | ENC |
| Transparency | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | 4 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | voice assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Ear Dance |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX7 |
优缺点
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Csasan J90 Pro
- Strong mic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong anc (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average build (34th percentile)
价格
Technics EAH-AZ1000.426每美元得分
vs
Csasan J90 Pro3.112每美元得分
Csasan J90 Pro 性价比高 7.3 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 39 specs.
