EarFun Air Pro 4
EarFun
86 综合评分
vs
Philips TAT3519GY/00
Philips
56 综合评分
买家怎么说
EarFun Air Pro 4
92 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
EarFun Air Pro 4 耳机提供了卓越的性价比，用户称赞其高端音质、有效的降噪和强劲的电池续航。许多评论者指出，它们远超 AirPods Pro 和 Sony XM4 等更昂贵的竞争对手，尤其是在通过应用程序自定义均衡器之后。一些小问题包括偶尔需要调整佩戴贴合度以及单耳蓝牙连接的一个小特性，但总体评价极为正面。
优点
- 支持LDAC和aptX Lossless的出色音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 长续航（单次充电11小时）
- 卓越的性价比
- 舒适且稳固的佩戴
缺点
- 单耳蓝牙连接的小特性
- 偶尔需要调整佩戴贴合度
- 启用LDAC会禁用多点配对
- 部分用户无法使用Le Audio
Sound quality 8
Noise cancellation 7
Value for money 7
Battery life 4
Build quality 4
App customization 6
Philips TAT3519GY/00
72 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
这些降噪耳塞在音质、舒适度和主动降噪性能方面获得了大部分正面反馈，多位用户指出，与大型品牌相比，它们提供了极佳的性价比。然而，电池续航是一个重大争议点，一些用户报告仅能使用3-6小时，远低于广告宣传。少数用户还提到ANC导致的耳压感以及侧睡时的不适。总体而言，该产品因其功能和做工而受到好评，但电池续航的不一致性拖了后腿。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 泡沫耳塞佩戴舒适
- 有效的降噪功能
- 性价比高
- 紧凑的充电盒
缺点
- 电池续航不一致（3-6小时）
- ANC导致的耳压感
- 侧睡时不舒服
- 没有静音/ANC语音提示
- 耳塞形状对某些人来说过大
Sound quality 7
Battery life 5
Comfort 6
Noise cancellation 5
Value for money 3
Build quality 3
评分
Gaming
Budget
Travel
Fitness
Music
Commute
Calls
规格
| EarFun Air Pro 4 | Philips TAT3519GY/00 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 5 pairs of ear tips | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.09 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | hybrid | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 2★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | aptX Lossless, LDAC, LC3 | Philips TAT3519 Wireless Earbuds,True Wireless Headphones with Noise Canceling Pro,Dynamic Bass,Clear Call,24 H Battery Life,Fast Charging,Bluetooth 5.3,IPX4,App/Touch Control,Black |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive hybrid | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 11 hrs★ | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 10 min for 2 hours playback | 15 minutes for 1 hour |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 54 hrs★ | 24 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | EarFun Audio App | PHILIPS Headphones app |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IP55 | IPX4 |
优缺点
EarFun Air Pro 4
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
Philips TAT3519GY/00
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
- Strong battery (74th percentile)
- Below average sound (29th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (33rd percentile)
价格
EarFun Air Pro 41.142每美元得分
vs
Philips TAT3519GY/000.925每美元得分
EarFun Air Pro 4 性价比高 1.2 倍
结论
胜出: EarFun Air Pro 4
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 37 specs.
