JBL Vibe Beam JBLVBEAMBLKAM
JBL
67 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
89 综合评分
买家怎么说
JBL Vibe Beam JBLVBEAMBLKAM
85 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
JBL Vibe Beam 耳塞获得了压倒性的正面反馈，尤其是在通过应用程序调整均衡器后的音质方面。用户称赞其价格下令人印象深刻的低音、清晰度和音量，以及长电池寿命和卓越的耐用性，其中一副耳塞在洗衣机中经历了两次循环后仍能正常工作。然而，少数评论者指出佩戴贴合度存在问题，耳塞在运动时容易掉落，并且通话质量因背景噪音而受到批评。总体而言，对于预算有限的音乐爱好者来说，这些是出色的无线耳塞。
优点
- 调整均衡器后出色的音质
- 价格下令人印象深刻的低音
- 长电池寿命
- 卓越的耐用性
- 物有所值
缺点
- 贴合度问题导致耳塞掉落
- 通话质量受背景噪音影响
- 需要调整均衡器以获得最佳音质
- 最大音量低于有线版本
- 充电触点需要定期清洁
Sound quality 8
Battery life 4
Durability 3
Value for money 6
Fit and comfort 5
Call quality 3
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
评分
Calls
Budget
Commute
Music
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
规格
| JBL Vibe Beam JBLVBEAMBLKAM | Technics EAH-AZ80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | Large, Medium, Small | XS, S, M, L, XL |
| Weight | 0.05 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 8 mm | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | True Wireless, Long Battery Life | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | 7 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 10min=2hrs | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs★ | 16 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Capacity | — | 85 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Google Assistant | Alexa, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | JBL Headphones App | Technics Audio Connect |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP54 | IPX4 |
优缺点
JBL Vibe Beam JBLVBEAMBLKAM
- Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong mic (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
价格
JBL Vibe Beam JBLVBEAMBLKAM2.237每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ800.596每美元得分
JBL Vibe Beam JBLVBEAMBLKAM 性价比高 3.8 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 38 specs.
