Technics EAH-AZ80-K

Technics EAH-AZ80-K

Technics
71 综合评分
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro

Samsung
89 综合评分

买家怎么说

Technics EAH-AZ80-K

92 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价

Technics EAH-AZ80耳机因其卓越的音质、舒适度和多点连接而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户称赞其宽广的声场、细致的音频和舒适的佩戴感,有些人指出它们超越了Sennheiser和Sony等竞争对手。一些小问题包括略显机械的通话质量以及可能通过接触清洁剂解决的充电盒问题。

优点
  • 卓越的音质
  • 宽广的声场
  • 舒适的佩戴感
  • 出色的降噪功能
  • 3设备多点连接
缺点
  • 略显机械的通话质量
  • 充电盒可能存在问题
  • 低音对某些人来说不够震撼
  • 高频缺陷被指出
👍 Sound quality 5
👍 Comfort 3
👍 Noise cancelling 3
👍 Multipoint connectivity 2
🤔 Call quality 2
👍 Battery life 2

Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro

72 满分 100 置信度高 109 条评价

总体而言,用户对这些翻新的Galaxy Buds3 Pro的音质、降噪和性价比感到满意,经常将其与AirPods进行有利比较。然而,大量投诉集中在包装中缺少耳塞、充电问题和耐用性担忧上,有些设备在几个月内就出现故障。尽管存在这些问题,许多人认为它们非常划算,尤其是对三星用户而言,并且在正常工作时,舒适度和电池续航都受到赞赏。

优点
  • 出色的音质
  • 有效的降噪
  • 翻新品的良好价值
  • 佩戴舒适
  • 电池续航长
缺点
  • 包装中缺少耳塞
  • 充电问题
  • 耐用性问题
  • 电池随时间衰减
  • 部分用户佩戴不合适
👍 Sound quality 25
👍 Noise cancellation 15
👍 Value for money 12
👎 Missing ear tips 8
👎 Charging issues 7
👎 Durability 6

评分

Budget
Technics
65
Samsung
96
Fitness
Technics
38
Samsung
91
Commute
Technics
68
Samsung
90
Travel
Technics
61
Samsung
87
Gaming
Technics
69
Samsung
84
Calls
Technics
74
Samsung
83
Music
Technics
75
Samsung
81

规格

Technics EAH-AZ80-KSamsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Style—true wireless
Ear Tips—Large, Small
Weight0.06 kg0.01 kg★
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm10.5 mm★
Drivers—2★
Freq Max—96 kHz★
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio✓✓
CodecsLDACAAC, Samsung Seamless, SBC
Noise Control
ANC✓✓
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency✓✓
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth—5.4★
Profiles—A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, PBP, TMAP
Multipoint✓✓
Wired Connector—Bluetooth
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs★6 hrs
Charge Time—2 hrs★
Fast Charging—Yes★
Charging—USB-C★
Case Battery
Case Battery24 hrs26 hrs★
Case Charging—USB-C★
Wireless Charging✓✓
Capacity—53 mAh★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count8★6
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice Assistant—Bixby, Google Assistant
Touch Controls✓✓
AppTechnics Audio ConnectGalaxy Wearable App
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode—✗
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water Resistance—IP57

优缺点

Technics EAH-AZ80-K

  • Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong sound (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong anc (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average battery (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (33rd percentile)

价格

Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro is US$47 cheaper (1.4x less).

Technics EAH-AZ80-K0.397每美元得分
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro0.674每美元得分

Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro 性价比高 1.7 倍

结论

★ 胜出: Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro

Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 37 specs.

Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro 更擅长:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

也值得考虑