1MORE Triple Driver E1001
1MORE
55 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
86 综合评分
买家怎么说
1MORE Triple Driver E1001
88 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
1More Triple Driver 入耳式监听耳机提供了出色的清晰度和中性音质，可与昂贵得多的发烧级设备相媲美。用户赞赏其高级的开箱体验、钛金属构造和舒适的记忆海绵耳塞，尽管少数人注意到音量控制器质感廉价。低音爱好者可能会觉得它不够有力，但平衡的高音和中频让声音和乐器表现出色。总体而言，这些耳机被认为在 100 美元以下具有不可思议的性价比。
优点
- 卓越的清晰度和细节
- 中性和平衡的音质
- 高级钛金属制造质量
- 舒适的记忆海绵耳塞
- 奢华的开箱体验
缺点
- 廉价的音量控制器模块
- 低音爱好者可能觉得低音不够有力
- 由于钛金属构造而略重
Sound quality 8
Build quality 6
Value for money 5
Packaging 5
Comfort 4
Bass performance 3
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
评分
Music
Commute
Calls
Gaming
Budget
Fitness
Travel
规格
| 1MORE Triple Driver E1001 | Technics EAH-AZ80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | ear-tip | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 9 sets of included ear tip sizes | XS, S, M, L, XL |
| Weight | 0.02 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | hybrid | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 7 mm | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 3★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz | 40 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 99 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | 1MORE Triple Driver in-Ear Earphones Hi-Res High Fidelity Headphones Warm Bass, Spacious Reproduction, High Resolution, Mic in-Line Remote Smartphones/PC/Tablet - Silver/Gray | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours |
| Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 16 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Capacity | — | 85 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 1 | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Alexa, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | — | Technics Audio Connect |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
优缺点
1MORE Triple Driver E1001
- Strong comfort (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong sound (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong anc (74th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average affordability (33rd percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (11th percentile)11th %ile
价格
1MORE Triple Driver E10010.792每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ800.573每美元得分
1MORE Triple Driver E1001 性价比高 1.4 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 37 specs.
