Skullcandy Method S2MTW-T995
Skullcandy
63 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
Skullcandy Method S2MTW-T995
68 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
总体而言，用户称赞令人印象深刻的音质，尤其是低音和Bose调校的音频，以及有效的降噪和良好的电池续航。然而，一些抱怨集中在笨重的充电盒、充电不稳定和户外风噪上。佩戴问题和传感器问题也影响了本应积极的体验。
优点
- 令人印象深刻的低音和音质
- 有效的降噪
- 良好的电池续航
- Bose调校的音频
- 舒适的佩戴选项
缺点
- 笨重的充电盒
- 充电不稳定
- 户外风噪
- 耳塞对某些人来说太小
- 阳光导致传感器问题
Sound quality 7
Battery life 4
Charging case 4
Noise cancelling 3
Fit and comfort 3
Wind noise 1
Technics EAH-AZ100
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
用户对Technics EAH-AZ100耳机普遍持积极态度，称赞其卓越的音质，尤其是LDAC和杜比全景声，以及令人惊讶的有效AI通话降噪功能，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。舒适度、通过应用程序进行定制以及可靠的电池续航也受到强调。唯一提到的潜在缺点是价格较高，但大多数人认为高端功能物有所值。
优点
- LDAC带来的卓越音质
- AI通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 可靠的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- ANC比AZ80稍弱
Sound quality 8
Call quality 2
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Skullcandy Method S2MTW-T995 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | Small, Medium, Large | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.09 kg | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 12 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 97.0999984741211 dB★ | — |
| Max SPL | 97.0999984741211 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Skullcandy Method 360 ANC Wireless Earbuds, Sound by Bose, Bluetooth Headphones, Premium Noise Cancelling, Up to 40 Hrs Battery, Sweat and Water Resistant, Microphone for iPhone Android - Leopard | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adjustable | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 11 hrs★ | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 10 Minutes for 2 Hours | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 29 hrs★ | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Skull-iQ | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX4 |
优缺点
Skullcandy Method S2MTW-T995
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong mic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong anc (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong battery (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
Skullcandy Method S2MTW-T9950.702每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.426每美元得分
Skullcandy Method S2MTW-T995 性价比高 1.6 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 41 specs.
