Fangflower Wireless
Fangflower
58 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
Fangflower Wireless
42 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
这些廉价无线耳机的口碑褒贬不一。虽然许多用户称赞其令人印象深刻的电池续航、舒适的佩戴感和方便的充电显示，但也有相当多的用户报告了严重缺陷，例如一个耳机很快没电、充电盒完全故障以及按钮粘滞。客户服务参差不齐，有些人能迅速收到更换产品，而另一些人则陷入支持循环。总体而言，该产品在正常工作时似乎物有所值，但质量控制是一个主要问题。
优点
- 令人印象深刻的电池续航
- 佩戴舒适
- 方便的充电显示
- 良好的音质
- USB-C充电
缺点
- 一个耳机很快没电
- 充电盒完全故障
- 按钮粘滞或卡住
- 质量控制差
- 开箱即坏
Battery life 7
Build quality 5
Charging case 3
Comfort 3
Sound quality 4
Customer service 2
Technics EAH-AZ100
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
用户对Technics EAH-AZ100耳机普遍持积极态度，称赞其卓越的音质，尤其是LDAC和杜比全景声，以及令人惊讶的有效AI通话降噪功能，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。舒适度、通过应用程序进行定制以及可靠的电池续航也受到强调。唯一提到的潜在缺点是价格较高，但大多数人认为高端功能物有所值。
优点
- LDAC带来的卓越音质
- AI通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 可靠的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- ANC比AZ80稍弱
Sound quality 8
Call quality 2
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Fangflower Wireless | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.08 kg | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 14.199999809265137 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 2★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth Headphones with HiFi Stereo Noise Cancelling Mic, USB-C Charging Case, 50H Playtime with LED Display, IPX7 Water Resistant in Earphones for Sports, Travel, Blue | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Environmental Noise Cancellation | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.3 |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | USB-C port for quick charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 50 hrs★ | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX7 | IPX4 |
优缺点
Fangflower Wireless
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong mic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong battery (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
Fangflower Wireless5.846每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.426每美元得分
Fangflower Wireless 性价比高 13.7 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 39 specs.
