Fangflower Wireless
Fangflower
59 综合评分
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods
TOZO
82 综合评分
买家怎么说
Fangflower Wireless
42 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
这些廉价无线耳机的口碑褒贬不一。虽然许多用户称赞其令人印象深刻的电池续航、舒适的佩戴感和方便的充电显示，但也有相当多的用户报告了严重缺陷，例如一个耳机很快没电、充电盒完全故障以及按钮粘滞。客户服务参差不齐，有些人能迅速收到更换产品，而另一些人则陷入支持循环。总体而言，该产品在正常工作时似乎物有所值，但质量控制是一个主要问题。
优点
- 令人印象深刻的电池续航
- 佩戴舒适
- 方便的充电显示
- 良好的音质
- USB-C充电
缺点
- 一个耳机很快没电
- 充电盒完全故障
- 按钮粘滞或卡住
- 质量控制差
- 开箱即坏
Battery life 7
Build quality 5
Charging case 3
Comfort 3
Sound quality 4
Customer service 2
TOZO Crystal Pods
92 满分 100 置信度中 23 条评价
TOZO Crystal Pods 和 NC20 耳机因其出色的音质、舒适的佩戴感和令人印象深刻的电池续航能力而广受赞誉，价格也非常实惠。用户强调其有效的主动降噪功能、通过 TOZO 应用程序可自定义的均衡器以及多麦克风带来的可靠通话质量。一些小批评包括应用程序在通话中的限制、偶尔对小耳朵的贴合问题以及某些型号缺少电池指示灯，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 舒适稳固的佩戴
- 长电池续航
- 有效的主动降噪
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
缺点
- 通话时应用程序限制
- 小耳朵贴合问题
- 某些型号缺少电池指示灯
- 触摸控制容易误触
- 麦克风质量在价格上可以更好
Sound quality 18
Comfort and fit 14
Battery life 10
Active noise cancellation 12
App experience 10
Call quality 8
评分
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
Commute
Music
Calls
规格
| Fangflower Wireless | TOZO Crystal Pods | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | Medium |
| Weight | 0.08 kg | 0.04 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 14.199999809265137 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 2★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth Headphones with HiFi Stereo Noise Cancelling Mic, USB-C Charging Case, 50H Playtime with LED Display, IPX7 Water Resistant in Earphones for Sports, Travel, Blue | LDAC |
| Surround | — | Stereo, Surround |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Environmental Noise Cancellation | hybrid |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | 7 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | USB-C port for quick charging | 10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 50 hrs★ | 35 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4 | 4 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | voice assistant | Other |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | TOZO App |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX7 | IPX5 |
优缺点
Fangflower Wireless
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong mic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong battery (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average build (34th percentile)
TOZO Crystal Pods
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong mic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
价格
Fangflower Wireless5.886每美元得分
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods3.575每美元得分
Fangflower Wireless 性价比高 1.6 倍
结论
胜出: TOZO Crystal Pods
Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 37 specs.
