Xmenha AK57
Xmenha
39 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
Xmenha AK57
68 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
这些耳塞收到了褒贬不一的反馈。许多用户喜欢其舒适度、音质和电池续航，认为它们非常适合睡觉或隐蔽使用。然而，一些人抱怨对小耳朵贴合度差、一小时后感到不适，以及充电盒无法牢固固定耳塞。总体而言，对于那些觉得舒适的人来说，它们物有所值，但贴合问题对其他人来说是一个决定性因素。
优点
- 睡觉时舒适
- 音质好
- 电池续航长（每只耳塞4小时）
- 蓝牙配对简单
- 低电量语音提醒
缺点
- 对小耳朵贴合度差
- 一小时后不舒适
- 充电盒无法牢固固定耳塞
- 比描述的大
- 对某些人来说音质差
Comfort 5
Sound quality 4
Battery life 2
Fit 3
Case design 2
Ease of use 2
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Xmenha AK57 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | In-Ear | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | l | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.09 kg | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | balanced armature | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Lightweight, Sports & Exercise, Universal Phone Control, Water Resistant | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Waterproof | IPX4 |
优缺点
Xmenha AK57
- Strong connectivity (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Strong mic (67th percentile)
- Below average battery (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
Xmenha AK571.310每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.426每美元得分
Xmenha AK57 性价比高 3.1 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 39 specs.
