Cuzabe CBH11
Cuzabe
42 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics
86 综合评分
买家怎么说
Cuzabe CBH11
55 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
用户对这些蓝牙耳塞的评价褒贬不一。电池续航时间一直受到称赞（9-12小时），但耐用性是一个主要问题，多个设备在一个月内出现故障。舒适度尚可，但容易脱落，充电接口是过时的micro USB。客户服务在解决问题方面获得高度评价。
优点
- 出色的电池续航时间（9-12小时）
- 良好的蓝牙连接
- 全天佩戴舒适
- 出色的客户服务
- 音量很大
缺点
- 耐用性差（一个月内故障）
- 容易从耳朵脱落
- 过时的micro USB充电接口
- 低音不足
- 自动重连不起作用
Battery life 4
Durability 3
Comfort 3
Bluetooth connectivity 3
Sound quality 3
Charging port 2
Technics EAH-AZ80
78 满分 100 置信度中 21 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ10 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的积极反馈，具有清晰分离、宽广声场和自然调音，可与高端型号媲美。用户称赞其舒适稳固的贴合度、不会使音频浑浊的有效降噪以及长达7小时的出色电池续航。然而，一些批评性评论指出了触摸控制不灵敏的问题，一位用户在使用1.5年后出现了明显的音量不平衡，而公司仅提供10%的折扣用于更换。总体而言，强烈推荐给发烧友和日常使用，但潜在买家应意识到可能的耐用性和控制问题。
优点
- 卓越的音质，清晰分离
- 舒适稳固的贴合度
- 有效的降噪，不损失音质
- 长达7小时的出色电池续航
- 出色的通话质量
缺点
- 触摸控制不灵敏
- 长时间使用后音量不平衡
- 缺陷产品客户服务差
- 对某些用户来说设计笨重
- 在非常嘈杂的环境中降噪不足
Sound quality 10
Fit and comfort 7
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 6
Call quality 4
Touch controls 2
评分
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Travel
Budget
Fitness
规格
| Cuzabe CBH11 | Technics EAH-AZ80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | neckband | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | XS, S, M, L, XL |
| Weight | 0.06 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Ear Plugs Bluetooth Headphones for Work, Neckband Wireless Earbuds, Noise Reduction in-Ear Earphones with Mic and Controls, Waterproof Earbuds with 20 Hours Battery, for Industrial Safety | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 20 hrs★ | 7 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 20 hrs★ | 16 hrs |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Capacity | — | 85 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Alexa, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | — | Technics Audio Connect |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Waterproof | IPX4 |
优缺点
Cuzabe CBH11
- Strong anc (74th percentile)
- Strong battery (73rd percentile)
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Strong comfort (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average sound (28th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ80
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile
价格
Cuzabe CBH111.394每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ800.572每美元得分
Cuzabe CBH11 性价比高 2.4 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ80
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 35 specs.
