Cuzabe CBH11
Cuzabe
45 综合评分
vs
EarFun Air Pro 4
EarFun
86 综合评分
买家怎么说
Cuzabe CBH11
55 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
用户对这些蓝牙耳塞的评价褒贬不一。电池续航时间一直受到称赞（9-12小时），但耐用性是一个主要问题，多个设备在一个月内出现故障。舒适度尚可，但容易脱落，充电接口是过时的micro USB。客户服务在解决问题方面获得高度评价。
优点
- 出色的电池续航时间（9-12小时）
- 良好的蓝牙连接
- 全天佩戴舒适
- 出色的客户服务
- 音量很大
缺点
- 耐用性差（一个月内故障）
- 容易从耳朵脱落
- 过时的micro USB充电接口
- 低音不足
- 自动重连不起作用
Battery life 4
Durability 3
Comfort 3
Bluetooth connectivity 3
Sound quality 3
Charging port 2
EarFun Air Pro 4
92 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
EarFun Air Pro 4 耳机提供了卓越的性价比，用户称赞其高端音质、有效的降噪和强劲的电池续航。许多评论者指出，它们远超 AirPods Pro 和 Sony XM4 等更昂贵的竞争对手，尤其是在通过应用程序自定义均衡器之后。一些小问题包括偶尔需要调整佩戴贴合度以及单耳蓝牙连接的一个小特性，但总体评价极为正面。
优点
- 支持LDAC和aptX Lossless的出色音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 长续航（单次充电11小时）
- 卓越的性价比
- 舒适且稳固的佩戴
缺点
- 单耳蓝牙连接的小特性
- 偶尔需要调整佩戴贴合度
- 启用LDAC会禁用多点配对
- 部分用户无法使用Le Audio
Sound quality 8
Noise cancellation 7
Value for money 7
Battery life 4
Build quality 4
App customization 6
评分
Gaming
Budget
Travel
Fitness
Music
Commute
Calls
规格
| Cuzabe CBH11 | EarFun Air Pro 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | neckband | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 pairs of ear tips |
| Weight | 0.06 kg | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | hybrid |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Ear Plugs Bluetooth Headphones for Work, Neckband Wireless Earbuds, Noise Reduction in-Ear Earphones with Mic and Controls, Waterproof Earbuds with 20 Hours Battery, for Industrial Safety | aptX Lossless, LDAC, LC3 |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.0★ | 6.0 |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 20 hrs★ | 11 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 min for 2 hours playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 20 hrs | 54 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | — | EarFun Audio App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Waterproof | IP55 |
优缺点
Cuzabe CBH11
- Strong battery (75th percentile)
- Strong anc (73rd percentile)
- Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average sound (29th percentile)
EarFun Air Pro 4
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
Cuzabe CBH111.494每美元得分
vs
EarFun Air Pro 41.142每美元得分
Cuzabe CBH11 性价比高 1.3 倍
结论
胜出: EarFun Air Pro 4
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 37 specs.
