Panasonic RP-HJE120-A
Panasonic
24 综合评分
vs
JBL Vibe Buds 2
JBL
76 综合评分
评分
Budget
Travel
Gaming
Music
Calls
Commute
Fitness
规格
| Panasonic RP-HJE120-A | JBL Vibe Buds 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | Small, Medium, Large |
| Weight | 0.00 kg★ | 0.04 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 9 mm★ | 8 mm |
| Drivers | 9★ | 8 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | 110 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 95 dB★ |
| Codecs | — | SBC, AAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6, HFP 1.8 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 10 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 Minutes for 3 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 40 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✗ |
| Capacity | — | 49 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Microsoft Cortana |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IP54 |
优缺点
Panasonic RP-HJE120-A
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong sound (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average social proof (24th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
JBL Vibe Buds 2
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong mic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
价格
Panasonic RP-HJE120-A1.977每美元得分
vs
JBL Vibe Buds 22.548每美元得分
JBL Vibe Buds 2 性价比高 1.3 倍
结论
胜出: JBL Vibe Buds 2
Scores 76 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 36 specs.
