Apple EarPods
Apple
17 综合评分
vs
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
EarFun
92 综合评分
评分
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Fitness
Commute
Music
Calls
规格
| Apple EarPods | EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 pairs of ear tips |
| Weight | — | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | hybrid |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | aptX Lossless, LDAC, LE Audio, LC3 |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth 5 |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 12 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 min for 2 hours playback |
| Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 54 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | EarFun Audio App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | IP55 |
优缺点
Apple EarPods
- Strong build (69th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average social proof (23th percentile)
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
Apple EarPods0.696每美元得分
vs
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+1.146每美元得分
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+ 性价比高 1.6 倍
结论
胜出: EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
Scores 92 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 37 specs.
