Anker Space A40 (A3936011)
Anker
81 综合评分
vs
Sennheiser CX 80U
Sennheiser
50 综合评分
买家怎么说
Anker Space A40 (A3936011)
88 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
Soundcore Space A40 耳机在音质、电池续航和降噪方面获得了压倒性的积极反馈。用户赞赏其可定制的应用程序、舒适的佩戴感和性价比，尽管有些人指出主动降噪不如竞争对手强大，并且在某些环境中连接偶尔会中断。总体而言，它们被强烈推荐为高端品牌的预算友好型替代品。
优点
- 出色的音质，可自定义均衡器
- 长续航，支持快速充电
- 有效的降噪
- 舒适稳固的佩戴
- 极高的性价比
缺点
- 主动降噪不如某些竞争对手强大
- 偶尔出现蓝牙连接断开
- 触控同时只能使用少数功能
- 耳塞可能对某些用户造成不适
- 电池续航略低于宣传
Sound quality 8
Battery life 7
Noise cancellation 7
Value for money 6
Comfort and fit 6
App and customization 5
Sennheiser CX 80U
72 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
森海塞尔有线耳塞收到了褒贬不一的反馈。许多用户称赞其清晰、均衡的音质和低廉价格下的卓越性价比，有人称其为20美元以下最好的有线耳塞。然而，一些评论指出低音不足、耐用性问题（如一年后一侧无声），还有一位用户认为其音质对于该品牌来说出奇地差。总体而言，它们被视为音质清晰、可靠的预算选择，但不适合低音爱好者。
优点
- 清晰均衡的音质
- 卓越的性价比
- 良好的清晰度和细节
- 佩戴舒适
- 轻巧设计
缺点
- 低音响应弱
- 耐用性问题（一侧无声）
- 线缆较细
- 不同单元音质不一致
- 按钮控制问题
Sound quality 8
Value for money 5
Bass performance 4
Durability 3
Build quality 3
Comfort 2
评分
Budget
Travel
Commute
Fitness
Gaming
Music
Calls
规格
| Anker Space A40 | Sennheiser CX 80U | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | in-ear |
| Ear Tips | XS, S, M, L, XL | S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.02 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | DLC Driver | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 11 mm★ | 9.699999809265137 mm |
| Drivers | — | 9★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 17 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 28 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 119 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | LDAC | Sennheiser CX 80S 3.5 mm, angled Connector Ear canal Wired In-Ear Headphones |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.2★ | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | USB-C | 3.5mm |
| Range | 15 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 10 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 0.16699999570846558 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 10 min for 4 hours playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 50 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2★ | 1 |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Mic Pattern | — | Omni-directional |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Google Assistant | voice assistants |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | soundcore | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
优缺点
Anker Space A40 (A3936011)
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong comfort (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (33rd percentile)
Sennheiser CX 80U
- Strong sound (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong comfort (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (34th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
价格
Anker Space A40 (A3936011)1.342每美元得分
vs
Sennheiser CX 80U1.981每美元得分
Sennheiser CX 80U 性价比高 1.5 倍
Anker Space A40 (A3936011)
Sennheiser CX 80U
结论
胜出: Anker Space A40
Scores 81 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 38 specs.
