ICESOMNUS X12 Pro
ICESOMNUS
30 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
ICESOMNUS X12 Pro
72 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
这些耳机因其稳固的贴合度而受到称赞，特别是对于无法佩戴入耳式设计的用户，以及自动连接和价格合理的音质。然而，一些用户报告了廉价的塑料感、对大耳朵的不适以及偶尔的连接问题。耳翼被认为太软而无效，光泽外壳容易刮花。
优点
- 非入耳式用户的稳固贴合
- 自动连接
- 价格合理的音质
- 长电池寿命
- 长时间佩戴舒适
缺点
- 廉价的塑料感
- 大耳朵不舒服
- 偶尔连接问题
- 耳翼太软无效
- 光泽外壳易刮花
Fit and comfort 6
Build quality 4
Sound quality 4
Connectivity 3
Battery life 3
Ear wings 2
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 满分 100 置信度中 28 条评价
Technics EAH-AZ100 耳机因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，用户强调深沉的低音、清晰的高音和沉浸式音频。舒适度、电池续航和降噪功能也经常受到称赞，尽管一些用户指出价格较高且音量有限。提到了蓝牙 LE 断开和初始多设备配对等小问题，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 深沉沉浸式低音
- 有效的降噪功能
- 舒适的佩戴感
- 出色的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- 最大音量有限
- 蓝牙 LE 断开
- 多设备配对问题
- 塑料外壳
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| ICESOMNUS X12 Pro | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | half-in-ear | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | — | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 14.199999809265137 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 101 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Sabbat X12 Pro 2025 New Bluetooth 5.4 Wireless Earbuds–ENC Noise Reduction,Hi-Fi Sound,Low Latency,30H Long Battery Life,In-Ear Headphones for Sports&Work,Compatible with iPhone,iOS,Android(Pink) | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.3 |
| Profiles | HSP, HFP, A2DP, AVRCP | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 6 hrs | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 1 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 30 hrs★ | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Android Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
优缺点
ICESOMNUS X12 Pro
- Strong connectivity (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong sound (69th percentile)
- Strong mic (67th percentile)
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
- Below average battery (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (33rd percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
ICESOMNUS X12 Pro0.642每美元得分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.426每美元得分
ICESOMNUS X12 Pro 性价比高 1.5 倍
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 40 specs.
